UNIT 3
EDUCATION COMMISSIONS 1964-66
EDUCATION COMMISSIONS 1964-66
·
Learning Objectives
·
Introduction
·
Appointment of the Commission
o Unique Features
of the Commission
o Terms of
reference
o Making of the
Report
·
Report of the Commission
·
Recommendations
o Education and
National Objectives
o Educational
Structure
·
Let Us Sum Up
·
Answers to Check Your Progress
·
Possible Questions
·
References
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
·
Explain the appointment of the Education Commission of
1964-66 and its unique features.
·
Know the making of the report of 1964-66.
·
Identify the objectives of the Commission.
·
Describe the educational structure recommended by the
commission.
INTRODUCTION
In this unit, we will discuss about
Kothari Education Commission, 1964-66, which was the sixth commission in the
history of commission in India. The Five Years Plan, started after independence
helped the growth of the country in many areas. However, the execution of these
plans expresses the inherent weakness due to which the expected success was not
being achieved. Education appeared to be one of areas which indicated many
problems that needed our efforts for immediate solutions. The government was
fully aware of the situation. To improve the educational set up the government
constituted two commissions after independence. We have already discussed about
the two commissions, i.e. Radhakrishnan Commission in unit 2 , which deals with
university education and Secondary Education Commission in unit 3, confined to
secondary education only. The recommendations of these two commissions could
not be succeeded in its full implementations. Consequently, the defects in the
area of education persisted. In order to remove theses defects, the government
had to appoint a new education commission to advise the government on national
pattern of education along with general principles and policies for the
development of education at all stages.
This unit deals with the recommendations of the Kothari Education Commission in different aspects of education.
APPOINTMENT OF THE COMMISSION
The Commission was appointed under
provision of a resolution of the Government of India, dated 14th July, 1964.
The Commission included eminent educationists in diverse fields from India and
abroad. It consisted of total 17 members, where 14 members, 1 member -
secretary, 1 Associate - Secretary and Dr. D.S. Kothari, chairman of the U.G.C.
was appointed as the chairman of the commission. Therefore, it is also known as
the Kothari Commission. Among the members of the commission 5 educationists
were from England, America, France, Japan and Russia. J.P. Naik was appointed
as number secretary of the commission and J.F McDougall as associated
secretary.
LET US KNOW
Prof. D.S. Kothari, Chairman, University Grants
Commission, New Delhi was appointed as the Chairman of the Commission. The
commission consisted of 17 members.
Unique Feature of the Commission
It is important for us to know the features that have
made this commission a unique commission from other earlier commissions.
The unique features of the Education Commission (1964-66) were:
The unique features of the Education Commission (1964-66) were:
i) All the five earlier commissions did not deal with
education as a whole but focussed attention on different levels of education.
But this commission was not to limit its enquiry to specific sectors or aspects
of education, but to have a comprehensive review of the Entire Educational
System.
ii) Another unique feature of the Commission was its
conviction that education is the most powerful instrument of the national
development. The crucial role of education in national development appears in
all its vividness on every page of the report.
Never before education was given such a niche of national honour, and never before was it conceived as a pivot of national honour, and never before was it conceived as a pivot of nation’s progress and the prosperity as revealed in the pages of the Commission’s Report.
Never before education was given such a niche of national honour, and never before was it conceived as a pivot of national honour, and never before was it conceived as a pivot of nation’s progress and the prosperity as revealed in the pages of the Commission’s Report.
iii) The international composition of the commission is
also significant. Education in India must necessarily emerge from Indian
experience, through, culture and local conditions. But as education remains the
common quest of mankind, it was found profitable to draw upon the experience
and thinking of educationists and scientists from other countries and to take
advantage of the latest developments in the educationally advanced countries.
As such the commission included 7 Indian members and 5 others; 1 each from
Japan, France, U.K., U.S.A. and USSR. besides, 20 consultants from different
countries of the world were available.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
1. Mention two unique features of the commission in the
given space.
Terms of Reference
The Commission will advice the Govt. on national pattern
of education and on the general principles and policies for the development of
education at all stages and in all its aspects. It need not, however, examine
the problems of medical or legal education, but such
aspects of these problems as are necessary for its
comprehensive enquiry may be looked into.
Making of the Report
The commission started its work on the birthday of
Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the nation. It constituted 12 task forces and 7
working groups for studying the various problems of education in the country.
It interviewed about 9000 men and women distinguished in public life,
educators, scientists, industrialists and scholars in different fields and
others interested in education. The Commission spent about hundred days in
visiting universities, colleges and schools and held discussions with teachers,
educationists, administrators and students. It received and scrutinized 2,400
Memorandum and notes. The commission worked for 21 months and submitted it
report on June, 1966
REPORT OF THE COMMISSION
The report of the commission is an excellent document on
education. In its report the commission expressed its form belief that
education is the most powerful instrument of national development. The report
of the commission has been appropriately entitled as ‘education and national
development’.
The report is divided into four sections –
Section I : deal with general Problems.
Section II : deal with Education at different
stages and in different sectors.
Section III : deals with implementation of the various
recommendations and programmes suggested by the commission.
Section IV : consists of supplementary papers.
The programmes of educational reconstructions proposed in this Report fall into three broad categories —
1) Internal transformation of the educational system so
as to relate it to the life, needs and aspirations of the nation.
2) Qualitative improvement of education so that the standards achieved are adequate, keeping continually rising and, at least in a few sectors become internationally comparable; and,
2) Qualitative improvement of education so that the standards achieved are adequate, keeping continually rising and, at least in a few sectors become internationally comparable; and,
3) Expansion of educational facilities broadly on the
basis of man - power needs and with an accent on equalization of educational
opportunities.
LET US KNOW
MAKING OF THE REPORT
- Set up 12
task forces and 7 working groups.
- Interviewed
9000 men and women.
- Spent 100
days.
- Begin its
task on 2nd October, 1964.
- Report
divided into four sections.
·
Programmes categorized into three.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
2. Fill in the blanks with appropriate word.
i) The
Education Commission is popularly known as the _________.
ii) The Govt.
of India appointed a commission by a resolution on _______.
iii) _______
was the chairman of the UGC.
iv) The
Commission submitted its report on _______________
v) The report
consists of _________ chapters and is divided into ________ sections.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE KOTHARI EDUCATION COMMISSION
Let us discuss the recommendations of the commission. Our
discussion will confined to two major aspects of the recommendations, i.e.,
education and national objectives and educational structure only.
Education and National Objectives -
Education has a very extensive role to play in changing
the men and society. It has to be entirely reformed and related to the life,
needs and aspirations of the people so that it may serve as a powerful tool of
social, economic and cultural transformation. In order to relate education, the
commission recommended the following objectives-
1. Increase in Productivity.
2. Promoting social and National Integration
3. Education and Modernization
4. Developing social, moral and spiritual values.
1. Increase in Productivity –
The Commission suggested that education must be related
to productivity to increase national income. In order to link education and
productivity the Indian Education Commission made the following
recommendations.
i) Science is the basic component of education and
culture ; so it should be made an integral part of school education.
ii) To inculcate the value of manual work the commission recommended the introduction of work experience in school education.
iii) To meet the increasing needs of technical personnel in Industry, agriculture and trade the IEC recommended to introduce vocational subjects in school curriculum. It also opined that the vocationalisation will bring education into closer relationship with productivity.
2. Promoting social and National Integration –
ii) To inculcate the value of manual work the commission recommended the introduction of work experience in school education.
iii) To meet the increasing needs of technical personnel in Industry, agriculture and trade the IEC recommended to introduce vocational subjects in school curriculum. It also opined that the vocationalisation will bring education into closer relationship with productivity.
2. Promoting social and National Integration –
National and social integration is the precondition for
the progress and development of a country. According to the commission, Social
and National Integration is an important objective of a national system of
education. The commission made the following recommendations for strengthening
social and national integration through education.
i) To make education a powerful instrument of national development, common school system of public education should be adopted.
ii) Bridge the gulf between the educated and the uneducated, intellectuals and masses, social and national service should be made an integral part of school education.
iii) A language is a firm adhesive for social and
national integration, suitable provisions should be made for teaching mother
tongue, Hindi and other Modern Indian languages in schools.
3. Education and Modernisation –
The present society is the science - based society. The
present century has made tremendous advancement in scientific and technical
knowledge as a result of explosion of knowledge. In such a situation one of the
main functions of education is to keep pace with this advancement of knowledge.
Another feature of modern society is the rapid social change. In the situation
of change, the school must always be alert if it is to keep abreast of
significant changes. An education system which does not renovate itself
continuously, becomes out-dated and puts hindrance to progress. To keep pace
with modernisation the IEC is of the opinion that “greater emphasis must be
placed on vocational subjects, science education and research.”
4. Social, moral and spiritual values –
The national system of education should emphasis on the
cultivation of social, moral and spiritual values among students. For this purpose
the commission made the following recommendations-
i) The Central
and State governments should adopt measures to introduce education in moral,
social and spiritual values in all institutions under their direct control on
the lines recommended by the University Education Commission on religious and
moral instruction.
ii) In order to develop social, moral and religious values, some periods should be provided in the time table. Instruction of this type should be given by general teachers.
ii) In order to develop social, moral and religious values, some periods should be provided in the time table. Instruction of this type should be given by general teachers.
iii) The University
departments should be specially concerned with the ways in which these values
can be taught wisely and effectively and should undertake preparation of the
special literature for use by students and teacher.
LET US KNOW
OBJECTIVES OF THE COMMISSION
1. Increase in Productivity.
2. Promoting Social and national Integration.
3. Education and Modernization.
4. Developing Social, moral and Spiritual values
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
3. Explain the following –
i) Education and productivity.
ii) Education and modernisation.
Educational Structure
The Commission recommended a new structural pattern of
education. The new educational structure should be as follows:
·
One to three years of pre-school education.
·
A primary stage of 7 to 8 years divided into a lower
primary stage of 4 or 5 years and a higher primary stage of 3 or 2 years.
·
A lower secondary stage of 3 or 2 years of general
education or 1 to 3 years of vocational education.
·
A higher secondary stage of 2 years of general education
or 1 to 3 years of vocational education, 50% of the total would be under
vocational education,
·
A higher education stage of 3 years or more for the first
degree course followed by courses of varying durations for the second or
research degrees.
The structural pattern thus recommended by the commission
is commonly known as 10+2+3. Let us know the structural pattern of
education.
·
Pre-school education from 1 to 3 years should also be
given.
·
General education should last for a period of 10 years –
o
4 years of lower primary,
o
3 years of higher primary
o
3 years of lower secondary education.
·
Higher secondary education should be fixed for 2 years.
·
Degree course should be of 3 years.
The age of admission to class I should
not be less than 6+. The first public external examination should come at the
end of the first 10 years of schooling. Secondary schools should be of two
types : higher schools providing a 10 years’ course and higher secondary
schools providing a course of 11 or 12 years. A new higher secondary course
consisting of classes XI and XII should be introduced. The pre-university
courses should be transferred from Universities and added to the secondary
schools. The Commission has been suggested the reorganisation of the university
stage. At this stage, the three year degree has been favoured by the
Commission.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
4. Write a few lines on structural change in the system
of education as suggested by the Indian Education Commission (1964-66).
LET US SUM UP
In this unit, we have covered the following points:
·
The Education Commission 1964-66 was appointed by the
Government of India on July 14th, 1964. Dr. D.S. Kothari, was appointed as the
Chairman of the commission. The Commission submitted its report on June 29th,
1966.
·
The Commission set 12 task forces and 7 working groups;
interviewed 9000 men and women interested in education in the country and
toured for 100 days. The report contains 19 chapters.
·
The Commission had some unique features, they were-
·
i) Not to limit its inquiry to specific sectors or
aspects of education, but to have a comprehensive, review of the entire
educational system.
ii) Its firm belief that education is the most powerful instrument of the national development.
ii) Its firm belief that education is the most powerful instrument of the national development.
·
iii) Its International Composition. The commission
included 7 Indian members and 5 others; 1 each from Japan, France, U.K., U.S.A.
and USSR.
·
The objectives, as recommended by the commission were
increasing productivity; promoting social and national integration; education
and modernisation and developing social, moral and spiritual values. A new
educational structure was also developed.
ANSWERS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
1. i) The Commission tried to
cover every field and aspect of Education.
ii) Its firm
belief that education is the most powerful instrument of national development.
2. (i)
Kothari Commission (ii) July 14, 1964 (iii) Dr. D.S. Kothari (iv) 29th June;
1966 (v) 19, four.
3. i) For increasing
productivity education should be job - oriented and greater importance should
be given to education in agriculture, science, industrial and technical
subjects. In place of bookish education greater importance should be attached
to the acquisition of practical knowledge and skill.
ii) Society may
be modernised through modernisation of education. Thus new ideas will be
developed in society and narrow ideas will disappear. The expansion of science
and technical education is necessary for modernization of society.
4. One to three years of pre -
school education should be given. General education should last for a period of
10 years. Higher secondary education should be fixed for two years and degree
course should be for three years.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1. Discuss the
place of the Education Commission of 1964-66 in the educational reforms in
India.
2. Evaluate the
recommendations of the Education Commission 1964-66 for improvement of higher
education in the country.
3. How has the
Education Commission of 1964-66 viewed education as a means of national
development? Explain.
4. Describe the
conditions in the country that necessitated the appointment of Education
Commission 1964-66.
FURTHER READING
- Aggarwal,
J.C., : Landmarks in the History of Modern Indian Education; Vikas
Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi; Reprint 1994.
- Chaube,
S.P., : History and Problems of Indian Education; Vindo Pustak Mandir,
Agra 2 ; Fourth Edition 1992.
- Nanda,
S.K. : Indian Education and its problems today; Kabyani Publishers, New
Delhi; second Edition 1982.
- Rawat,
P.L. : History of Indian Education; Ram Prasad and sons, Agra; Reprint
1991.
- Sharma,R.N.,:History and Problems of Education in India ; Surjeet Publication, Delhi, fourth Edition 2004.
- Aggarwal, J.C. : Development and planning of Modern education, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, Reprint 2003.
No comments:
Post a Comment